Controlling the Debate
P. Schultz
June 9, 2012
Here is an
example of how the Democrats and Republicans control the political debate
without directly colluding.
First, the
Democrats leak information about Obama that he is actually in charge of our
killer drones, deciding who lives and who dies, and how he was responsible for
disrupting Iran’s nuclear energy development.
Second, the
Republicans complain that these “leaks” undermine national security and call
for investigations of them.
Third, after
appropriate and righteous denials from the president and others, Attorney
General Holder promises to find out who “leaked” this information and the
Republicans in the House of Representatives promise to hold hearings on these
“leaks.”
Now, take
note of what has transpired and what is no longer at issue. No longer is the
issue whether the president has the
power to kill anyone he chooses to kill or whether
he should have or exercise this power. In fact, these issues are decided in the
affirmative without any debate over them. They are decided in absentia as it
were.
The same
process was visible in the recent debate over whether our drones were killing
efficiently, that is, without too much “collateral damage” in the form of the
killing of children. This debate displaced any debate over the use of drones to
kill other human beings and any debate over whether these killings could ever
actually decide or even influence the outcome in Afghanistan or Pakistan. It is
just assumed that the use of drones is legitimate, not cowardly, and that their
use will influence or even decide the war in Afghanistan.
This stuff
goes on all the time. Example: How do we fix Social Security? Draws our
attention away from the question: How did Social Security get “broken?” Or: Who
broke Social Security? Perhaps those who broke it are those who are promising
to fix it and I for one think that this is madness. Sort of like putting the
fox in charge of the hen house.
No comments:
Post a Comment