Don’t Know Much About History
P. Schultz
April 2, 2014
Here, from
a book entitled Subversives: The FBI’s
War on Student Radicals, is a bit history that at least I was never
introduced to in my schooling. It involves an optional essay question on a 1959
English aptitude test for those who were applying to the University of
California. That question was: “What are the dangers to a democracy of a
national police organization, like the FBI, which operates secretly and is
unresponsive to criticism?”
Now, this
question, thanks to the help a member of the American Legion, which
organization was working with the FBI at that time to identify those who
constituted a threat to national security, came to the attention of the FBI,
making J. Edgar Hoover livid. “He viewed the question not only as subversive
but as an attack on the FBI – and he took any attack on the bureau personally.
His hand passed quickly across the memo as he scrawled….: ‘We really should
stir up as many protests as possible.’” [p. 64] And Hoover’s assistant and
close confidant, Tolson, assigned this matter to on “Deke” DeLoach, who headed
what was called “the Crime Records Division” but was in fact the bureau’s
public relations appendage.
To fulfill
his responsibilities in this matter, DeLoach sent a letter to the American
Legion’s national commander, which he, the commander, was to pretend he had
written himself and send it to the chancellor at UCLA, protesting the question.
DeLoach also contacted the chief of Hearst Newspapers’ Washington, D.C. bureau
and called upon him to attack the university for allowing such a question to be
used on the test. The Los Angeles Herald
Examiner, owned by the Hearst chain, promptly published a story repeating
allegations of a “vicious communist propaganda scheme” and an editorial
critical of the university. The FBI also made use of the House Un-American
Activities Committee as well as the Los Angeles Archdiocese to publicly condemn
the question.
The FBI
then proceeded to try to determine who was responsible for the question itself
but pretty much came up empty. In the course if its efforts, however, it
scrutinized professors at UCLA and USC, as well as the essays written in
response to this question. The essays were evenly split between those for and
against the FBI and pass rates were virtually the same.
Hoover was
very much pleased with the bureau’s efforts to stir up protests to this
question and sent Vice President Richard Nixon a letter in which he wrote: “A
storm of protest immediately arose in many parts of the state against this
viciously misleading question….The minds of young students were being
impregnated with the complete falsehood under the guise of truth.”
It is
fortunate that Hoover and the FBI were so attuned to the threats to national
security in those times. We can only hope there are some today who are also so
attuned to those threats!
No comments:
Post a Comment