Why Trump Cannot “Drain the Swamp”
P. Schultz
President
Trump labeled Washington, D.C. “a swamp” when he was running for president and
he promised “to drain” it if elected. So far, “the Donald” has been anything
but successful in “draining the swamp.” And there is a simple reason why: Because
D.C. is not a swamp. It is a political artifact; so the only way to
change it is to adopt a different kind of politics.
“A
political artifact, you say. What does that mean?”
Well, as
some of the Anti-Federalists foresaw, the ten mile square governmental district
that was to be established after the proposed constitution was ratified
reflected a kind of politics that would be inconsistent with a republican
scheme of government. For the Anti-Federalists, a genuinely republican scheme
of government was one that was a reflection of the people it governed,
not a refinement as the Federalist wanted. For the Anti-Federalists,
to be a republic meant to be representative and to be representative meant to
be reflective; that is, a republican government should look like, even mirror
the people.
For the
Anti-Federalists, the proposed constitution did not look to, was not calculated
to create a government reflective of the people. It was meant to be a refinement
of the people, meaning that there would be distance, both demographic and
geographic, between the new government and the people. And the ten mile square
district to be created would help maintain these distances. That district would
be something like a refuge, a place set apart from the people and, hence, from
the popular will. Life in that district would not resemble life outside it,
which is recognized today when people speak about life “inside the beltway” and
life outside it. It is also reflected by the fact that most Americans go to
Washington as tourists, much as they go to foreign countries.
Insofar as
this is correct, then contrary to what Trump – and many others – think, “the
swamp” that is D.C. can only be changed by adopting a more republican scheme of
government or kind of politics. That is, we need to recover the understanding
of a “republican government” as a government that reflects the people and their
will, that seeks to follow, not refine, the popular will. How to do this? Besides
jettisoning the thought that we the people need “visionary leaders,” term
limits would help as would having presidents vacate the White House, thereby
separating the president’s residence from his office, or his persona from his official
status, like other modern executives. Trashing “Hail to the Chief” would also
help.
As has been
argued here frequently, our problems, our issues, our defects are political
problems, political issues, and political defects. They cannot be adequately
dealt with except by changing our politics. Otherwise, as in attempts to “drain
the swamp” that is said to be D.C., our politics will be “Promethean;” that is futile.
No comments:
Post a Comment