Trump’s Opposition: Mutating Toward……
Peter Schultz
That
Trump’s opposition is mutating is illustrated by their increasingly shrill
cries, cries that seem to echo those of Trump’s supporters when, in reference
to Hillary, they bellowed, “Lock her up! Lock her up!”
We
shouldn’t be surprised by this, I think, insofar as this seems to be a fairly
common phenomenon among the self-righteous who possess and/or think they
deserve to possess a great deal of power. When the efforts of these types are
resisted, or are not recognized as legitimate, they become increasingly
frustrated and begin to imagine that their enemies are fanatics beyond
habilitation or rehabilitation, beyond anything but the naked exercise of
power. Thus, cries of “Lock him up! Lock him up!” are heard throughout
Trumpland.
This
phenomenon has been noted among torturers who, when they are unsuccessful in
“breaking” their prisoner, begin to feel as if they were being victimized. The
tortured are torturing the torturer! With predictable results. Similarly, this
phenomenon is visible in escalations during war, especially among military
forces that are deemed “superior” to their allegedly “lesser” – that is, weaker
and more backward – enemies. The allegedly superior forces, feeling victimized,
resort to ever-greater force to try to prevail, with predictable and ghastly results.
Much of the
rhetoric of the anti-Trump “resistance” carries with it an implicit assertion
that Trump and his supporters are “lesser” than they, the resisters; that is,
less educated, less socially respectable, less cultured, less rational, etc.
Hillary called Trump supporters “deplorables,” indicating that she and her
supporters are superior to her enemies in the Trump camp. She and her
supporters should have prevailed – and even should prevail now. Hence, impeachment
is justified if for no other reason than to right “the wrong” done in the 2016
election. Because Trump is “less,” hence “inferior, he should not be president
and he cannot be a legitimate president.
This
mindset often leads to extremism, to a kind of fanaticism by which the
“superior” stakes all on defeating, oppressing, subduing the “inferior.” As a
result, those who like to think of themselves as superior undermine the ground
of their alleged superiority. Doing battle with an alleged “beast,” they become
beastly themselves. And it becomes a question of exactly who is more
deplorable.
No comments:
Post a Comment